Re: [PATCH v3] um: net: replace GFP_KERNEL with GFP_ATOMIC when spinlock is held

[Richard Weinberger]

Am 29.10.2015 um 15:50 schrieb Joe Perches:
> On Thu, 2015-10-29 at 14:46 +0530, Saurabh Sengar wrote:
>> replace GFP_KERNEL with GFP_ATOMIC while spinlock is held,
>> as code while holding a spinlock should be atomic.
>> GFP_KERNEL may sleep and can cause deadlock,
>> where as GFP_ATOMIC may fail but certainly avoids deadlock
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Saurabh Sengar <saurabh.truth@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> v3: removed the atomic variable, as per Richard comment
> 
> Trivia: You could remove the gfp_mask variables too
> 	and just use GFP_KERNEL and GFP_ATOMIC directly.

Yep.
And "int gfp_mask" does also not make sense, GFP_* is of type
gfp_t.

Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/