Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] enable I2C devices behind I2C bus on Gen2

[Lee Jones]

On Fri, 30 Oct 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Oct 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 2015-10-07 at 13:18 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >> > There is a board in the wild, i.e. Intel Galileo Gen2, that has ACPI
> >> > enumerated
> >> > devices behind I2C bus.
> >>
> >> Lee, since Wolfram is going to apply patches 1 and 5, how could we
> >> proceed with the rest? Patches are indeed build independent, though
> >> they are unified by enabling logically piece-by-piece. It would be
> >> great if you think you may apply them to your v4.4 queue.
> >
> > So we're just waiting for Thierry's Ack now, right?
> 
> That's right. Either Ack, or he might apply patch by himself. It
> wouldn't be harmful in any case.

I'll give him another few days.  If we don't hear anything then I'll
apply them all bar the PWM patch.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/