Re: [BUG] IB/hfi1: might sleep under spinlock in hfi1_ioctl()
From: ira.weiny
Date: Fri Oct 30 2015 - 19:58:27 EST
On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 12:32:29AM +0300, Alexey Khoroshilov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> hfi1_ioctl() contains many calls to might sleep functions with
> dd->hfi1_snoop.snoop_lock spinlock held (for example, access_ok,
> copy_from_user, kzalloc(GFP_KERNEL), etc.).
>
> Should dd->hfi1_snoop.snoop_lock be acquired just before updating state?
I believe you are correct.
I am currently in the process of pushing fixes to the staging tree.
We have a patch which fixes this queued up but it depends on at least one other
patch in my queue.
I will do my best to get this submitted soon.
Thanks,
Ira
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/