Re: [PATCH] ipc/msg: Implement lockless pipelined wakeups

[George Spelvin]

> Don't we need to keep that NULL init? I might be missing something.

I wondered the same thing, but on reading it, the cleanup is that he's
gotten rid of the need for the entire thing.  Previously, there was a
mechanism for detecting "wakeup not quite finished" that used a NULL
value, but it's no longer needed.

The resultant busy-waiting on the part of the woken-up task was the
entire problem this patch aims to fix.  So it gets rid of a whole lot
of code and barriers.  And, as you noticed, the comments explaining them.

As the old code explained, the issue is that a task may exit as
soon as r_msg is set, so the wakeup procedure has to be:
- Ensure r_msg is set to NULL (special-case flag)
- Do the wake up
- Set r_msg to the final value

The woken-up task has to spin as long as r_msg is NULL.  Ick.

However, a wake_q keeps a reference to a task, so exiting is
not a danger.  As long as wake_q_add precedes setting r_msg,
all is well.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/