Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the block tree

From: kbuild test robot
Date: Sun Nov 01 2015 - 11:06:07 EST


Hi Stephen,

[auto build test WARNING on block/for-next -- if it's inappropriate base, please suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base]

url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Stephen-Rothwell/linux-next-manual-merge-of-the-akpm-current-tree-with-the-block-tree/20151101-235406
config: x86_64-randconfig-x018-201544 (attached as .config)
reproduce:
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make ARCH=x86_64

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

In file included from include/linux/linkage.h:4:0,
from include/linux/kernel.h:6,
from block/blk-core.c:14:
block/blk-core.c: In function 'blk_queue_enter':
block/blk-core.c:641:8: error: implicit declaration of function 'gfpflags_allow_blocking' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
if (!gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp))
^
include/linux/compiler.h:147:28: note: in definition of macro '__trace_if'
if (__builtin_constant_p((cond)) ? !!(cond) : \
^
>> block/blk-core.c:641:3: note: in expansion of macro 'if'
if (!gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp))
^
block/blk-core.c: In function 'generic_make_request':
block/blk-core.c:2041:33: error: '__GFP_RECLAIM' undeclared (first use in this function)
if (likely(blk_queue_enter(q, __GFP_RECLAIM) == 0)) {
^
include/linux/compiler.h:147:28: note: in definition of macro '__trace_if'
if (__builtin_constant_p((cond)) ? !!(cond) : \
^
block/blk-core.c:2041:3: note: in expansion of macro 'if'
if (likely(blk_queue_enter(q, __GFP_RECLAIM) == 0)) {
^
>> block/blk-core.c:2041:7: note: in expansion of macro 'likely'
if (likely(blk_queue_enter(q, __GFP_RECLAIM) == 0)) {
^
block/blk-core.c:2041:33: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
if (likely(blk_queue_enter(q, __GFP_RECLAIM) == 0)) {
^
include/linux/compiler.h:147:28: note: in definition of macro '__trace_if'
if (__builtin_constant_p((cond)) ? !!(cond) : \
^
block/blk-core.c:2041:3: note: in expansion of macro 'if'
if (likely(blk_queue_enter(q, __GFP_RECLAIM) == 0)) {
^
>> block/blk-core.c:2041:7: note: in expansion of macro 'likely'
if (likely(blk_queue_enter(q, __GFP_RECLAIM) == 0)) {
^
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors

vim +/if +641 block/blk-core.c

625 }
626
627 struct request_queue *blk_alloc_queue(gfp_t gfp_mask)
628 {
629 return blk_alloc_queue_node(gfp_mask, NUMA_NO_NODE);
630 }
631 EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_alloc_queue);
632
633 int blk_queue_enter(struct request_queue *q, gfp_t gfp)
634 {
635 while (true) {
636 int ret;
637
638 if (percpu_ref_tryget_live(&q->q_usage_counter))
639 return 0;
640
> 641 if (!gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp))
642 return -EBUSY;
643
644 ret = wait_event_interruptible(q->mq_freeze_wq,
645 !atomic_read(&q->mq_freeze_depth) ||
646 blk_queue_dying(q));
647 if (blk_queue_dying(q))
648 return -ENODEV;
649 if (ret)

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation

Attachment: .config.gz
Description: Binary data