Re: [lkp] [mm, page_alloc] 43993977ba: +88% OOM possibility

[Michal Hocko]

On Mon 02-11-15 16:55:15, Huang, Ying wrote:
> Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
[...]
> > It would be interesting to see all the page allocation failure warnings
> > (if they are different). Maybe other callers have relied on GFP_ATOMIC
> > and access to memory reserves. The above path is not this case though.
> 
> I take a look at all dmesgs, and found the backtrace for page allocation
> failure is same for all.  Is it possible that this commit cause more
> memory were allocated or kept in memory so that more OOM were triggered?

I can imagine that some of the callers were not converted properly or
missed and a lack of __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM could indeed cause a later
kswapd kick off. I am staring into the commit but nothing has jumped at
me yet. Could you collect /proc/vmstat (snapshot every 1s) on both good
and bad kernels. I expect the later would see a less scanning by kswapd.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/