Re: [PATCH v6 2/6] drivers: psci: replace psci firmware calls
From: Jens Wiklander
Date: Mon Nov 02 2015 - 08:08:38 EST
On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 11:55:39AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 09:21:24AM +0100, Jens Wiklander wrote:
> > Switch to use a generic interface for issuing SMC/HVC based on ARM SMC
> > Calling Convention. Removes now the now unused psci-call.S.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/kernel/Makefile | 1 -
> > arch/arm/kernel/psci-call.S | 31 -------------------------------
> > arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile | 2 +-
> > arch/arm64/kernel/psci-call.S | 28 ----------------------------
> > drivers/firmware/psci.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
> > 5 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
> > delete mode 100644 arch/arm/kernel/psci-call.S
> > delete mode 100644 arch/arm64/kernel/psci-call.S
>
> [...]
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/psci.c b/drivers/firmware/psci.c
> > index 42700f0..53c9606 100644
> > --- a/drivers/firmware/psci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/firmware/psci.c
> > @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> > #include <linux/pm.h>
> > #include <linux/printk.h>
> > #include <linux/psci.h>
> > +#include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
> > #include <linux/reboot.h>
> >
> > #include <uapi/linux/psci.h>
> > @@ -56,8 +57,6 @@ struct psci_operations psci_ops;
> >
> > typedef unsigned long (psci_fn)(unsigned long, unsigned long,
> > unsigned long, unsigned long);
> > -asmlinkage psci_fn __invoke_psci_fn_hvc;
> > -asmlinkage psci_fn __invoke_psci_fn_smc;
> > static psci_fn *invoke_psci_fn;
> >
> > enum psci_function {
> > @@ -70,6 +69,24 @@ enum psci_function {
> >
> > static u32 psci_function_id[PSCI_FN_MAX];
> >
> > +static unsigned long __invoke_psci_fn_hvc(unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1,
> > + unsigned long a2, unsigned long a3)
>
> Minor comment, but could we keep these argument names the same as before
> please?
You mean function_id, arg0, arg1... instead? I guess I should update
arm-smccc.h also then.
>
> > +{
> > + struct smccc_res res;
> > +
> > + smccc_hvc(a0, a1, a2, a3, 0, 0, 0, 0, &res);
>
> It's slightly tempting to use varargs instead of the '0' argument padding,
> but that will probably make the asm code unmanageable.
Agree.
Thanks,
Jens
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/