[PATCH] x86/irq: Probe for PIC presence before allocating descs for legacy IRQs

[Vitaly Kuznetsov]

Commit d32932d02e18 ("x86/irq: Convert IOAPIC to use hierarchical irqdomain
interfaces") brought a regression for Hyper-V Gen2 instances. These
instances don't have i8259 legacy PIC but they use legacy IRQs for serial
port, rtc, and acpi. With this commit included we end up with these IRQs
not initialized. Earlier, there was a special workaround for legacy IRQs
in mp_map_pin_to_irq() doing mp_irqdomain_map() without looking at
nr_legacy_irqs() and now we fail in __irq_domain_alloc_irqs() when
irq_domain_alloc_descs() returns -EEXIST.

The essence of the issue seems to be that early_irq_init() calls
arch_probe_nr_irqs() to figure out the number of legacy IRQs before
we probe for i8259 and gets 16. Later when init_8259A() is called we switch
to NULL legacy PIC and nr_legacy_irqs() starts to return 0 but we already
have 16 descs allocated.

Solve the issue by separating i8259 probe from init and calling it in
arch_probe_nr_irqs() before we actually use nr_legacy_irqs() information.

Fixes: d32932d02e18 ("x86/irq: Convert IOAPIC to use hierarchical irqdomain interfaces")
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/i8259.h  |  1 +
 arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c |  3 +++
 arch/x86/kernel/i8259.c       | 24 ++++++++++++++++--------
 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/i8259.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/i8259.h
index ccffa53..bd55a77 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/i8259.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/i8259.h
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ struct legacy_pic {
 	void (*mask_all)(void);
 	void (*restore_mask)(void);
 	void (*init)(int auto_eoi);
+	void (*probe)(void);
 	int (*irq_pending)(unsigned int irq);
 	void (*make_irq)(unsigned int irq);
 };
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
index 836d11b..aadd7ae 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
@@ -361,6 +361,9 @@ int __init arch_probe_nr_irqs(void)
 	if (nr < nr_irqs)
 		nr_irqs = nr;
 
+	/* nr_legecy_irqs() depends on the PIC presence */
+	legacy_pic->probe();
+
 	return nr_legacy_irqs();
 }
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/i8259.c b/arch/x86/kernel/i8259.c
index 16cb827..96f1562 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/i8259.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/i8259.c
@@ -295,16 +295,11 @@ static void unmask_8259A(void)
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&i8259A_lock, flags);
 }
 
-static void init_8259A(int auto_eoi)
+static void probe_8259A(void)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 	unsigned char probe_val = ~(1 << PIC_CASCADE_IR);
 	unsigned char new_val;
-
-	i8259A_auto_eoi = auto_eoi;
-
-	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&i8259A_lock, flags);
-
 	/*
 	 * Check to see if we have a PIC.
 	 * Mask all except the cascade and read
@@ -312,16 +307,27 @@ static void init_8259A(int auto_eoi)
 	 * have a PIC, we will read 0xff as opposed to the
 	 * value we wrote.
 	 */
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&i8259A_lock, flags);
+
 	outb(0xff, PIC_SLAVE_IMR);	/* mask all of 8259A-2 */
 	outb(probe_val, PIC_MASTER_IMR);
 	new_val = inb(PIC_MASTER_IMR);
 	if (new_val != probe_val) {
 		printk(KERN_INFO "Using NULL legacy PIC\n");
 		legacy_pic = &null_legacy_pic;
-		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&i8259A_lock, flags);
-		return;
 	}
 
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&i8259A_lock, flags);
+}
+
+static void init_8259A(int auto_eoi)
+{
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	i8259A_auto_eoi = auto_eoi;
+
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&i8259A_lock, flags);
+
 	outb(0xff, PIC_MASTER_IMR);	/* mask all of 8259A-1 */
 
 	/*
@@ -388,6 +394,7 @@ struct legacy_pic null_legacy_pic = {
 	.mask_all = legacy_pic_noop,
 	.restore_mask = legacy_pic_noop,
 	.init = legacy_pic_int_noop,
+	.probe = legacy_pic_noop,
 	.irq_pending = legacy_pic_irq_pending_noop,
 	.make_irq = legacy_pic_uint_noop,
 };
@@ -400,6 +407,7 @@ struct legacy_pic default_legacy_pic = {
 	.mask_all = mask_8259A,
 	.restore_mask = unmask_8259A,
 	.init = init_8259A,
+	.probe = probe_8259A,
 	.irq_pending = i8259A_irq_pending,
 	.make_irq = make_8259A_irq,
 };
-- 
2.4.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/