Re: [PATCH -next] serial: etraxfs-uart: Fix crash
From: Uwe Kleine-König
Date: Mon Nov 02 2015 - 16:29:53 EST
Helo Niklas,
On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 10:13:25PM +0100, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> On 11/02/2015 08:37 AM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> >> The function call in the etraxfs-uart driver was not renamed,
> >> possibly due to interference with commit 7b9c5162c182 ("serial:
> >> etraxfs-uart: use mctrl_gpio helpers for handling modem signals").
> > Yes. BTW, 7b9c5162c182 looks broken, too, because the interrupt handling
> > is missing.
>
> The only drivers including serial_mctrl_gpio.h is atmel_serial.c,
> clps711x.c, mxs-auart.c and etraxfs-uart.c
>
> etraxfs commit
> 7b9c5162c182 ("serial: etraxfs-uart: use mctrl_gpio helpers for handling modem signals")
> is heavily influenced by
> 62b0a1b3e759 ("serial: clps711x: Use mctrl_gpio helpers for handling modem signals")
>
> a driver which also appears to lack mctrl irq setup/handling.
>
>
> Uwe, are you going to convert all serial drivers that includes serial_mctrl_gpio.h to
> use the new mctrl_gpio_init? (which also sets up irqs)
That is the plan. For drivers like mxs-auart (that do irq handling) this
is just simplification. When the irq handling is missing converting to
the new mctrl_gpio_init might introduce regressions because it does
request_irq which might fail.
> Since mctrl gpios are optional in the device tree, I guess mctrl_gpio_init handles if
> they are missing. So even if etraxfs-uart.c currently lacks mctrl irq setup/handling,
> if we migrate it to use the new mctrl_gpio_init, we will get this automatically?
Right, if there are no gpios specified (new and old) mctrl_gpio is a
nop.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/