Re: [PATCH 6/8] mm: lru_deactivate_fn should clear PG_referenced
From: Minchan Kim
Date: Mon Nov 02 2015 - 20:10:38 EST
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 01:47:11PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 30-10-15 16:01:42, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > deactivate_page aims for accelerate for reclaiming through
> > moving pages from active list to inactive list so we should
> > clear PG_referenced for the goal.
>
> I might be missing something but aren't we using PG_referenced only for
> pagecache (and shmem) pages?
You don't miss anything. For pages which are candidate of MADV_FREEing(
ie, normal anonymous page, not shmem, tmpfs), they shouldn't have any
PG_referenced. Although normal anonymous pages have it, VM doesn't respect
it. One thing I suspect is GUP with FOLL_TOUCH which calls mark_page_accesssed
on anonymous page and will mark PG_referenced.
Technically, it's not a problem but just want to notice in this time.
Primary reason was I want to make deactivate_page *general* so it could
be used for file page as well as anon pages in future.
But at the moment, user of deactivate_page is only MADV_FREE so it might
be better to merge the logic for anon page deactivation into
deactivate_file_page and rename it as general "deactivate_page"
if you're thinking it's better.
>
> >
> > Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Suggested-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > mm/swap.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c
> > index d0eacc5f62a3..4a6aec976ab1 100644
> > --- a/mm/swap.c
> > +++ b/mm/swap.c
> > @@ -810,6 +810,7 @@ static void lru_deactivate_fn(struct page *page, struct lruvec *lruvec,
> >
> > del_page_from_lru_list(page, lruvec, lru + LRU_ACTIVE);
> > ClearPageActive(page);
> > + ClearPageReferenced(page);
> > add_page_to_lru_list(page, lruvec, lru);
> >
> > __count_vm_event(PGDEACTIVATE);
> > --
> > 1.9.1
>
> --
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/