Re: [PATCH RESEND 00/16] Support TI LMU devices

From: Kim, Milo
Date: Tue Nov 03 2015 - 04:08:27 EST



On 11/3/2015 5:33 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
On Tue, 03 Nov 2015, Kim, Milo wrote:

Hi Lee,

On 11/2/2015 5:59 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
drivers/video/backlight/Kconfig | 62 ++
drivers/video/backlight/Makefile | 7 +
drivers/video/backlight/lm3532_bl.c | 183 +++++
drivers/video/backlight/lm3631_bl.c | 129 ++++
drivers/video/backlight/lm3632_bl.c | 125 ++++
drivers/video/backlight/lm3633_bl.c | 210 ++++++
drivers/video/backlight/lm3695_bl.c | 91 +++
drivers/video/backlight/lm3697_bl.c | 187 +++++
drivers/video/backlight/ti-lmu-backlight.c | 429 ++++++++++++
drivers/video/backlight/ti-lmu-backlight.h | 152 +++++
How different are all of these drivers?

Can you create one driver that supports them all instead?


Thanks for your suggestion.

'ti-lmu-backlight' is the common part of lmxxxx_bl drivers. And each
lmxxx_bl has its own operation functions by using ti_lmu_bl_ops.
I've tried to make consolidated driver but it contained too much
device specific code in one file. So I prefer simple drivers
structure - 'common part' and 'device specific operations'.
It would be appreciated if you could introduce better idea.

I wish to avoid having to apply the patches to conduct my own analysis
of the files, as I am severely restricted on time. Can you tell me how
much duplicated code there is between the files? How many lines would
be saved by supporting all of the lm* drivers in a single file?


Understood. Let me try it again. I'll get back to you soon.
Thanks for your help.

Best regards,
Milo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/