[for-next][PATCH 07/13] tracing: report_latency() in trace_irqsoff.c can return boolean

[Steven Rostedt]

From: Yaowei Bai <bywxiaobai@xxxxxxx>

This patch makes report_latency return bool due to this
particular function only using either one or zero as its
return value.

No functional change.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1443537816-5788-3-git-send-email-bywxiaobai@xxxxxxx

Signed-off-by: Yaowei Bai <bywxiaobai@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c b/kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c
index eaf5291bcf63..e4e56589ec1d 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c
@@ -282,16 +282,16 @@ static void irqsoff_print_header(struct seq_file *s)
 /*
  * Should this new latency be reported/recorded?
  */
-static int report_latency(struct trace_array *tr, cycle_t delta)
+static bool report_latency(struct trace_array *tr, cycle_t delta)
 {
 	if (tracing_thresh) {
 		if (delta < tracing_thresh)
-			return 0;
+			return false;
 	} else {
 		if (delta <= tr->max_latency)
-			return 0;
+			return false;
 	}
-	return 1;
+	return true;
 }
 
 static void
-- 
2.6.1


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/