Re: [PATCH v9 10/17] phy: Add driver for rockchip Display Port PHY

From: Yakir Yang
Date: Tue Nov 03 2015 - 19:48:58 EST


Hi Brain,

On 11/03/2015 12:38 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
Hi Yakir,

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 09:58:38AM +0800, Yakir Yang wrote:
Add phy driver for the Rockchip DisplayPort PHY module. This
is required to get DisplayPort working in Rockchip SoCs.

Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner<heiko@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Yakir Yang<ykk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
...
diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-dp.c b/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-dp.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f3e0058
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-dp.c
@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
+/*
+ * Rockchip DP PHY driver
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2015 FuZhou Rockchip Co., Ltd.
+ * Author: Yakir Yang<ykk@@rock-chips.com>
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+ * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/clk.h>
+#include <linux/phy/phy.h>
+#include <linux/regmap.h>
+#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+
+#define GRF_SOC_CON12 0x0274
+
+#define GRF_EDP_REF_CLK_SEL_INTER_HIWORD_MASK BIT(4)
+#define GRF_EDP_REF_CLK_SEL_INTER BIT(4)
Why are the above two macros the same? Judging by the RK3288 manual and
other downstream drivers, it seems like you want the _MASK one to be
shifted left by 16 (i.e., BIT(20)).

Oops, yes, you're right, it should be BIT(20), thanks for the catch.

+
+#define GRF_EDP_PHY_SIDDQ_HIWORD_MASK BIT(21)
+#define GRF_EDP_PHY_SIDDQ_ON 0
+#define GRF_EDP_PHY_SIDDQ_OFF BIT(5)
+
...

+ ret = regmap_write(dp->grf, GRF_SOC_CON12, GRF_EDP_REF_CLK_SEL_INTER |
+ GRF_EDP_REF_CLK_SEL_INTER_HIWORD_MASK);
IOW, the above is writing:

BIT(4) | BIT(4)

whereas I think you want:

BIT(4) | BIT(20)

+ if (ret != 0) {
+ dev_err(dp->dev, "Could not config GRF edp ref clk: %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
...

(FYI, I came across this by inspection when comparing Heiko's
'somewhat-stable' branch [1] with this series. The former brings up eDP
fine on veyron-jaq, whereas this one doesn't yet, even with the above
change. Still debugging the issue.)

Hmm... I'm not sure whether your eDP screen have the hotplug signal, so I
think you can try to add "analogix,force-hpd" flag into rk3288-veyron-jaq.dts

&edp {
analogix,need-force-hpd;
}


If that changes couldn't fix the problem, guess you may need max the panel
power up delay time which pointed by Heiko. Like:

Thanks,
- Yakir


diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
index 4fa5f69..546a506 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
@@ -82,6 +82,13 @@ static int analogix_dp_detect_hpd(struct analogix_dp_device *dp)
*/
dev_dbg(dp->dev, "failed to get hpd plug status, try to force hpd\n");

+ /*
+ * Hotplug signal would indicate the right time to operate
+ * panel after poweron, but if the hotplug is missing, then
+ * panel would need wait hundreds of milliseconds at here.
+ */
+ mdelay(100);
+
analogix_dp_force_hpd(dp);

if (analogix_dp_get_plug_in_status(dp) != 0) {


Brian

[1]https://github.com/mmind/linux-rockchip/tree/devel/somewhat-stable





--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/