Re: [PATCH] arm64: bpf: fix div-by-zero case

[Daniel Borkmann]

On 11/04/2015 07:41 PM, Shi, Yang wrote:
...
> > > Agreed, and we may need add one more test cases in test_bpf module to cover
> > > MOD?
> >
> > Let me know if you have a test case ready :)
>
> Does the below change look like a valid test?
>
> +               "MOD default X",
> +               .u.insns = {
> +                       /*
> +                        * A = 0x42
> +                        * A = A mod X ; this halt the filter execution if X is 0
> +                        * ret 0x42
> +                        */
> +                       BPF_STMT(BPF_LD | BPF_IMM, 0x42),
> +                       BPF_STMT(BPF_ALU | BPF_MOD | BPF_X, 0),
> +                       BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_K, 0x42),
> +               },
> +               CLASSIC | FLAG_NO_DATA,
> +               {},
> +               { {0x1, 0x0 } },
> +       },
> +       {
> +               "MOD default A",
> +               .u.insns = {
> +                       /*
> +                        * A = A mod 1
> +                        * ret A
> +                        */
> +                       BPF_STMT(BPF_ALU | BPF_MOD | BPF_K, 0x1),
> +                       BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_A, 0x0),
> +               },
> +               CLASSIC | FLAG_NO_DATA,
> +               {},
> +               { {0x1, 0x0 } },
> +       },
>
> My test result with it:
> test_bpf: #284 MOD default X jited:1 ret 66 != 0 FAIL (1 times)
> test_bpf: #285 MOD default A jited:1 102 PASS
>
> If it looks right, I will post a patch to add the test cases.

Looks good to me.

Thanks,
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/