RE: [PATCH] ARM:dma-mapping: Handle DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL in _dma_page_cpu_to_dev()
From: Sharma, Sanjeev
Date: Thu Nov 05 2015 - 00:57:39 EST
-----Original Message-----
From: Russell King - ARM Linux [mailto:linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2015 4:24 PM
To: Will Deacon
Cc: Sharma, Sanjeev; m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM:dma-mapping: Handle DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL in _dma_page_cpu_to_dev()
On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 10:39:13AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 03:26:48PM +0530, Sanjeev Sharma wrote:
> > _dma_page_cpu_to_dev() treat DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL similar to
> > DMA_TO_DEVICE which means that destination buffer is device
> > memory,means cpu may have written some data to source buffer and
> > data may be in cache line.For cleaner operation we need to call
> > outer_flush_range() which will clean and invalidate outer cache lines.
>
> Why isn't the clean sufficient in this case? We're mapping the buffer
> to the device, so we clean the dirty lines in the CPU caches and make
> them visible to the device. If the CPU later wants to read the buffer
> (i.e. after the device has DMA'd into it), you'll need to map the
> buffer to the CPU, which will perform the invalidation of the CPU caches.
Indeed. bidirectional mode is already handled prefectly well by this code. No patches are required.
Thanks Russell & Will for providing input.
Let's assume , CPU don't read the buffer then there could be the problem correct ? IMO, to handle every use case outer_flush_range can be used ?
If still it doesn't make sense to use flush on bidirectional mappings, then FIXME comment should be removed from the function to avoid any
Confusion.
(I never received the original email.)
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/