Re: [PATCH 3/9] perf, tools, stat: Abstract stat metrics printing
From: Jiri Olsa
Date: Thu Nov 05 2015 - 01:52:59 EST
On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 03:43:07AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 09:42:48AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 05:50:22PM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >
> > SNIP
> >
> > > evsel->attr.type == PERF_TYPE_HW_CACHE &&
> > > evsel->attr.config == ( PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_L1D |
> > > ((PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_OP_READ) << 8) |
> > > - ((PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_RESULT_MISS) << 16)) &&
> > > - runtime_l1_dcache_stats[ctx][cpu].n != 0) {
> > > - print_l1_dcache_misses(out, cpu, evsel, avg);
> > > + ((PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_RESULT_MISS) << 16))) {
> > > + if (runtime_l1_dcache_stats[ctx][cpu].n != 0)
> > > + print_l1_dcache_misses(cpu, evsel, avg, out);
> > > + else
> > > + print_metric(ctxp, NULL, NULL, "of all L1-dcache hits", 0);
> >
> > hum, what's the reason for all those else cases
> > ending up printing nothing?
> >
> > we have one metric per line anyway right?
>
> There can be stuff after the metric, need to print spaces then to get
> the correct indentation.
what stuff?
jirka
>
> Also it's needed for the metrics only patch (posted separately) so
> that it can catch all column headers, even if some are missing initially.
>
> -Andi
>
> --
> ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/