Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] sched: introduce synchronized idle injection

[Arjan van de Ven]

On 11/5/2015 2:09 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> I can see such a scheme having a fairly big impact on latency, esp. with
> forced idleness such as this. That's not going to be popular for many
> workloads.

idle injection is a last ditch effort in thermal management, before
this gets used the hardware already has clamped you to a low frequency,
reduced memory speeds, probably dimmed your screen etc etc.

at this point there are 3 choices
1) Shut off the device
2) do uncoordinated idle injection for 40% of the time
3) do coordinated idle injection for 5% of the time

as much as force injecting idle in a synchronized way sucks, the alternatives are worse.


>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/