Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] sched: introduce synchronized idle injection

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 07:28:50AM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> well we have this as a driver right now that does not touch hot paths,
> but it seems you and tglx also hate that approach with a passion....

The current code is/was broken, but when I tried fixing it, tglx
objected to the entire approach yes...

Thomas, no arm twisting can convince you to reconsider the fake idle
task approach?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/