[PATCH 1/2] sched,numa: fix math underflow in task_tick_numa

From: riel
Date: Thu Nov 05 2015 - 15:56:38 EST


From: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>

The NUMA balancing code implements delays in scanning by
advancing curr->node_stamp beyond curr->se.sum_exec_runtime.

With unsigned math, that creates an underflow, which results
in task_numa_work being queued all the time, even when we
don't want to.

Avoiding the math underflow makes it possible to reduce CPU
overhead in the NUMA balancing code.

Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-and-tested-by: Jan Stancek <jstancek@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 824aa9f501a3..f04fda8f669c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -2302,7 +2302,7 @@ void task_tick_numa(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *curr)
now = curr->se.sum_exec_runtime;
period = (u64)curr->numa_scan_period * NSEC_PER_MSEC;

- if (now - curr->node_stamp > period) {
+ if (now > curr->node_stamp + period) {
if (!curr->node_stamp)
curr->numa_scan_period = task_scan_min(curr);
curr->node_stamp += period;
--
2.1.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/