Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] sched: introduce synchronized idle injection

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 03:36:25PM -0800, Jacob Pan wrote:

> I did some testing with the code below, it shows random
> [  150.442597] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 02
> [  153.032673] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 202
> [  153.203785] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 202
> [  153.206486] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 282
> I recalled that was why i checked for local_softirq_pending in the
> initial patch, still trying to find out how we can avoid that. These
> also causes non stop sched ticks in the inner idle loop.

Check the softirq stuff before calling throttle ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/