Re: GPU-DRM-i915: Delete an unnecessary check before the function call "pwm_put"

[Jani Nikula]

On Fri, 06 Nov 2015, SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> The pwm_put() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then
>>> returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.
>> 
>> The compiler doesn't need it, but IMO it's useful documentation for humans.
>
> How do you think about to extend the explicit documentation for
> the affected parameters in the Linux programming interfaces?

The question is, while reading intel_panel.c, which one conveys the
reader better the idea that panel->backlight.pwm may be NULL for some
connectors:

a)	if (panel->backlight.pwm)
		pwm_put(panel->backlight.pwm);
	
b)	pwm_put(panel->backlight.pwm);

No amount of documentation in pwm_put() kernel-doc is going to help with
that. In most cases, panel->backlight.pwm is in fact NULL. IMO
unconditionally calling pwm_put() on it gives the reader the wrong idea.

Others may disagree.

BR,
Jani.


-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/