[PATCH 4.2 092/110] EDAC, sb_edac: Fix TAD presence check for sbridge_mci_bind_devs()

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.2-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Seth Jennings <sjenning@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit 2900ea609616c2651dec65312beeb2a6e536bc50 upstream.

In commit

  7d375bffa524 ("sb_edac: Fix support for systems with two home agents per socket")

NUM_CHANNELS was changed to 8 and the channel space was renumerated to
handle EN, EP, and EX configurations.

The *_mci_bind_devs() functions - except for sbridge_mci_bind_devs() -
got a new device presence check in the form of saw_chan_mask. However,
sbridge_mci_bind_devs() still uses the NUM_CHANNELS for loop.

With the increase in NUM_CHANNELS, this loop fails at index 4 since
SB only has 4 TADs.  This results in the following error on SB machines:

  EDAC sbridge: Some needed devices are missing
  EDAC sbridge: Couldn't find mci handler
  EDAC sbridge: Couldn't find mci handle

This patch adapts the saw_chan_mask logic for sbridge_mci_bind_devs() as
well.

After this patch:

  EDAC MC0: Giving out device to module sbridge_edac.c controller Sandy Bridge Socket#0: DEV 0000:3f:0e.0 (POLLED)
  EDAC MC1: Giving out device to module sbridge_edac.c controller Sandy Bridge Socket#1: DEV 0000:7f:0e.0 (POLLED)

Signed-off-by: Seth Jennings <sjenning@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Aristeu Rozanski <aris@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-edac <linux-edac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1438798561-10180-1-git-send-email-sjenning@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 drivers/edac/sb_edac.c |    8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
@@ -1648,6 +1648,7 @@ static int sbridge_mci_bind_devs(struct
 {
 	struct sbridge_pvt *pvt = mci->pvt_info;
 	struct pci_dev *pdev;
+	u8 saw_chan_mask = 0;
 	int i;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < sbridge_dev->n_devs; i++) {
@@ -1681,6 +1682,7 @@ static int sbridge_mci_bind_devs(struct
 		{
 			int id = pdev->device - PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_SBRIDGE_IMC_TAD0;
 			pvt->pci_tad[id] = pdev;
+			saw_chan_mask |= 1 << id;
 		}
 			break;
 		case PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_SBRIDGE_IMC_DDRIO:
@@ -1701,10 +1703,8 @@ static int sbridge_mci_bind_devs(struct
 	    !pvt-> pci_tad || !pvt->pci_ras  || !pvt->pci_ta)
 		goto enodev;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < NUM_CHANNELS; i++) {
-		if (!pvt->pci_tad[i])
-			goto enodev;
-	}
+	if (saw_chan_mask != 0x0f)
+		goto enodev;
 	return 0;
 
 enodev:


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/