Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 3/4] ARM: BCM: Add SMP support for Broadcom NSP
From: Florian Fainelli
Date: Fri Nov 06 2015 - 15:04:44 EST
On 06/11/15 11:57, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 06/11/15 11:49, Kapil Hali wrote:
>> Add SMP support for Broadcom's Northstar Plus SoC
>> cpu enable method. This changes also consolidates
>> iProc family's - BCM NSP and BCM Kona, platform
>> SMP handling in a common file.
>>
>> Northstar Plus SoC is based on ARM Cortex-A9
>> revision r3p0 which requires configuration for ARM
>> Errata 764369 for SMP. This change adds the needed
>> configuration option.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kapil Hali <kapilh@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>
> Technically, this is not quite a RESEND, using the same git format-patch
> --subject command as before maybe?
>
> [snip]
>
>> +#ifndef __BCM_NSP_H
>> +#define __BCM_NSP_H
>> +
>> +extern void nsp_secondary_startup(void);
>
> This does not appear to be needed anymore since you use the standard
> secondary_boot entry point now.
>
>> +
>> +#endif /* __BCM_NSP_H */
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-bcm/kona_smp.c b/arch/arm/mach-bcm/platsmp.c
>> similarity index 75%
>> rename from arch/arm/mach-bcm/kona_smp.c
>> rename to arch/arm/mach-bcm/platsmp.c
>> index 66a0465..925402f 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-bcm/kona_smp.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-bcm/platsmp.c
>> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
>> /*
>> - * Copyright (C) 2014 Broadcom Corporation
>> + * Copyright (C) 2014-2015 Broadcom Corporation
>> * Copyright 2014 Linaro Limited
>> *
>> * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
>> @@ -12,16 +12,23 @@
>> * GNU General Public License for more details.
>> */
>>
>> -#include <linux/init.h>
>> +#include <linux/cpumask.h>
>> +#include <linux/delay.h>
>> #include <linux/errno.h>
>> +#include <linux/init.h>
>> #include <linux/io.h>
>> +#include <linux/jiffies.h>
>> #include <linux/of.h>
>> #include <linux/sched.h>
>> +#include <linux/smp.h>
>>
>> +#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
>> #include <asm/smp.h>
>> #include <asm/smp_plat.h>
>> #include <asm/smp_scu.h>
>>
>> +#include "bcm_nsp.h"
>
> Likewise.
>
>> +
>> /* Size of mapped Cortex A9 SCU address space */
>> #define CORTEX_A9_SCU_SIZE 0x58
>>
>> @@ -75,6 +82,37 @@ static int __init scu_a9_enable(void)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +static int nsp_write_lut(void)
>> +{
>> + void __iomem *sku_rom_lut;
>> + phys_addr_t secondary_startup_phy;
>> +
>> + if (!secondary_boot) {
>> + pr_warn("required secondary boot register not specified\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + sku_rom_lut = ioremap_nocache((phys_addr_t)secondary_boot,
>> + sizeof(secondary_boot));
>
> That looks weird to me, are not you intending to get a virtual mapping
> of the SKU ROM LUT base register address here? What would
> sizeof(function) return here?
secondary_boot != secondary_startup, I read it wrong, this is fine.
--
Florian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/