Re: [PATCH 4.1 11/86] iommu/amd: Fix BUG when faulting a PROT_NONE VMA

[Linus Torvalds]

On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Jay Cornwall <jay@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> commit d14f6fced5f9360edca5a1325ddb7077aab1203b upstream.
>
> handle_mm_fault indirectly triggers a BUG in do_numa_page
> when given a VMA without read/write/execute access. Check
> this condition in do_fault.

This reminds me.

I think the code is still wrong.

The thing is, the VM assumes that the caller has already checked
permissions. An dby "checked permissions", I mean actually checking
permissions. The AMD iommu driver doesn't do that, it does something
completely different, namely "check it's not PROT_NONE".

So I think the code should instead do something like

   if ((write && !(vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE)) || !(vma->vm_flags & VM_READ)) {
      up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
      handle_fault_error(fault);
      goto out;
   }

because it is *not* valid to call "handle_mm_fault()" with a write
fault unless you have write permissions (or with a read fault unless
you have read permissions).

And some "handle_mm_fault would BUG_ON()" comment is just bogus. It's
not handle_mm_fault()'s case that you called it without checking
proper permissions.

I'm not arguing against the stable backport, because that is fine. But
I think this should be fixed further.

Joerg?

                Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/