On Fri, 6 Nov 2015 18:30:01 +0000
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On 05/11/15 10:12, Peter Zijlstra wrote:what i am interested is not per cpu idle state but rather at the package
People, trim your emails!
On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 08:58:30AM -0800, Jacob Pan wrote:
I also like #2 too. Specially now that it is not limited to a
specific platform. One question though, could you still keep the
cooling device support of it? In some systems, it might make
sense to enable / disable idle injections based on temperature.
One of the key difference between 1 and 2 is that #2 is open loop
control, since we don't have CPU c-states info baked into
scheduler.
_yet_, there's people working on that. The whole power aware
scheduling stuff needs that.
Isn't the idle state information (rq->idle_state) already used in
find_idlest_cpu()?
What we use in energy aware scheduling is quite similar but since
we're interested in the index information of the c-state (to access
the right element of the idle_state vectors of the energy model, we
added rq->idle_state_idx.
level or domain. It must be an indication for the overlapped idle time.
Usually has to come from HW counters.