Re: [BUG, PATCH 03/10] sysfs: added __compat_only_sysfs_link_entry_to_kobj()
From: Jeremiah Mahler
Date: Sat Nov 07 2015 - 18:11:59 EST
Jarkko,
On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 12:31:09AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 10:08:56AM -0800, Jeremiah Mahler wrote:
> > Jarkko,
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 01:41:37PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 12:55:43PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 06:55:18PM -0800, Jeremiah Mahler wrote:
> > > > > Jarkko,
> > > > >
[...]
> > > I pushed a fix over here:
> > >
> > > https://github.com/jsakkine/linux-tpmdd/tree/fixes
> > >
> > This fix does work since it effectively avoids the call to
> > __compat_only_sysfs_link_entry_to_kobj().
> >
> > Have you tested cases where __compat_only_sysfs_link_entry_to_kobj()
> > is actually used?
>
> Yes, of course I have. And I checked your DSDT and my assumption was
> correct. There was no DSM in the ACPI object.
>
> However, there is probably another regression but it is caused by some
> patch that was added earlier. I strongly believe it is not caused by any
> of my 4.4 patches.
>
> I think what was happening with you was that
> __compat_only_sysfs_link_entry_to_kobj() was returning -ENOENT, which it
> should do when target is not found. This was propagated to tpm_tis and
> it probably messes up clean up somehow.
>
> I have to test my hypothesis as soon as possible. The fix that I pushed
> is still valid no matter which way the things are.
>
> > [...]
> >
> > --
> > - Jeremiah Mahler
>
> /Jarkko
It sounds like you have the problem figured out and have a good fix.
If I can do anything else to help let me know :-)
--
- Jeremiah Mahler
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/