Re: [RFC PATCH 08/28] lkl: system call interface and application API

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Sunday 08 November 2015 05:49:00 Octavian Purdila wrote:
> > Could you use the standard numbers from include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h?
> > Maybe include that header and then #undef the ones you don't support?
> > That would avoid having to assign a new number of each future syscall
> > that gets added.
> 
> It would be nice to do that but if we undef them warnings will be
> generated during the build (e.g. "warning: #warning syscall pause not
> implemented"). Is there a way to disable those warnings?

Yes:

#define __IGNORE_restart_syscall
#define __IGNORE_exit
...

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/