Hello Eduardo,
å 2015å11æ07æ 03:11, Eduardo Valentin åé:
On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 01:18:01PM +0800, Caesar Wang wrote:
The conversion table has the adc value and temperature.
In fact, the adc value only has the increment or decrement mode in
conversion table.
Moment, we can add the flag to be better support the *code_to_temp*
for differenr SoCs.
Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes in v2: None
Changes in v1: None
drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
index e828f18..9df027f 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
@@ -53,6 +53,16 @@ enum sensor_id {
};
/**
+* The conversion table has the adc value and temperature.
+* ADC_DECREMENT is the adc value decremnet.(e.g. v2_code_table)
+* ADC_INCREMNET is the adc value incremnet.(e.g. v3_code_table)
+*/
+enum adc_flag {
+ ADC_DECREMENT = 0,
+ ADC_INCREMENT,
+};
+
+/**
* The max sensors is two in rockchip SoCs.
* Two sensors: CPU and GPU sensor.
*/
@@ -66,6 +76,9 @@ struct chip_tsadc_table {
/* that analogic mask data */
unsigned long data_mask;
+
+ /* adc value is increment or decrement */
+ unsigned int flag;
Maybe bool? And rename to something more meaningful?
Sure, that should be a bool type.
I guess the rename in sort_flag......(maybe will have a better name)
Or do you plan to have more conditions to test in your flag?
Moment, the flag (increment or decrement) can support all the rockchip series SoCs have thermal function.
};Add an indentation.
struct rockchip_tsadc_chip {
@@ -223,19 +236,43 @@ static int rk_tsadcv2_code_to_temp(struct chip_tsadc_table table, u32 code,
WARN_ON(table.length < 2);
- code &= table.data_mask;
- if (code < table.id[high].code)
+ switch (table.flag) {
+ case ADC_DECREMENT:
+ code &= table.data_mask;
+ if (code < table.id[high].code)
return -EAGAIN; /* Incorrect reading */
Thanks, will be fixed in next patch.
- while (low <= high) {add an indentation.
- if (code >= table.id[mid].code &&
- code < table.id[mid - 1].code)
- break;
- else if (code < table.id[mid].code)
- low = mid + 1;
- else
- high = mid - 1;
- mid = (low + high) / 2;
+ while (low <= high) {
+ if (code >= table.id[mid].code &&
+ code < table.id[mid - 1].code)
+ break;
+ else if (code < table.id[mid].code)
+ low = mid + 1;
+ else
+ high = mid - 1;
+
+ mid = (low + high) / 2;
+ }
+ break;
+ case ADC_INCREMENT:
+ code &= table.data_mask;
+ if (code < table.id[low].code)
+ return -EAGAIN; /* Incorrect reading */
+
Ditto.
Thanks,
Caesar
+ while (low <= high) {_______________________________________________
+ if (code >= table.id[mid - 1].code &&
+ code < table.id[mid].code)
+ break;
+ else if (code > table.id[mid].code)
+ low = mid + 1;
+ else
+ high = mid - 1;
+
+ mid = (low + high) / 2;
+ }
+ break;
+ default:
+ pr_err("Invalid the table conversion\n");
}
/*
@@ -245,8 +282,8 @@ static int rk_tsadcv2_code_to_temp(struct chip_tsadc_table table, u32 code,
* to produce less granular result.
*/
num = table.id[mid].temp - v2_code_table[mid - 1].temp;
- num *= table.id[mid - 1].code - code;
- denom = table.id[mid - 1].code - table.id[mid].code;
+ num *= abs(table.id[mid - 1].code - code);
+ denom = abs(table.id[mid - 1].code - table.id[mid].code);
*temp = table.id[mid - 1].temp + (num / denom);
return 0;
@@ -367,6 +404,7 @@ static const struct rockchip_tsadc_chip rk3288_tsadc_data = {
.id = v2_code_table,
.length = ARRAY_SIZE(v2_code_table),
.data_mask = TSADCV2_DATA_MASK,
+ .flag = ADC_DECREMENT,
},
};
--
1.9.1
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel