Re: [RFC/PATCH] media: omap3isp: Set maximum DMA segment size

From: Robin Murphy
Date: Mon Nov 09 2015 - 10:27:15 EST


Hi Laurent,

On 09/11/15 14:18, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hello everybody,

Ping ?

Apologies, I did start writing a response a while ago, but it ended up getting subsumed into the bigger DMA API discussion thread.

On Tuesday 13 October 2015 16:18:36 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
The maximum DMA segment size controls the IOMMU mapping granularity. Its
default value is 64kB, resulting in potentially non-contiguous IOMMU
mappings. Configure it to 4GB to ensure that buffers get mapped
contiguously.

Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/isp.c | 4 ++++
drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/isp.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)

I'm posting this as an RFC because I'm not happy with the patch, even if it
gets the job done.

On ARM the maximum DMA segment size is used when creating IOMMU mappings. As
a large number of devices require contiguous memory buffers (this is a very
common requirement for video-related embedded devices) the default 64kB
value doesn't work.

Per the initial patch (6b7b65105522), dma_parms was intended to expose hardware limitations of scatter-gather-capable devices, to prevent DMA API implementations from merging segments beyond a device's limits. Thus the way 32-bit ARM (and seemingly noone else) is taking it as something to apply to non-scatter-gather-capable devices in order to force the DMA API implementation to merge segments seems very questionable.

There's nothing in the streaming DMA API which gives any guarantee of a contiguous mapping, so it's the incorrect assumption that it does which needs fixing. Whether we rework the callers or the API itself is the open question there, I think.

I haven't investigated the history behind this API in details but I have a
feeling something is not quite right. We force most drivers to explicitly
set the maximum segment size from a default that seems valid for specific
use cases only. Furthermore, as the DMA parameters are not stored directly
in struct device this require allocation of external memory for which we
have no proper management rule, making automatic handling of the DMA
parameters in frameworks or helper functions cumbersome (for a discussion
on this topic see http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg92467.html
and http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-> November/305913.html).

Is it time to fix this mess ?

I agree that it would certainly be preferable to tackle the underlying issue instead of adding more point hacks to further entrench non-portable code into the kernel. In terms of modifying the API, the most reasonable idea which comes to mind would be a DMA attribute, and on closer inspection, I see that DMA_ATTR_FORCE_CONTIGUOUS is already a thing - perhaps we should weigh up whether coherent and streaming DMA could overload the same attribute with subtly different meanings, or whether we'd want e.g. DMA_ATTR_FORCE_PHYS_CONTIGUOUS and DMA_ATTR_FORCE_DMA_CONTIGUOUS to coexist.

Robin.

diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/isp.c
b/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/isp.c index 17430a6ed85a..ebf7dc76e94d
100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/isp.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/isp.c
@@ -2444,6 +2444,10 @@ static int isp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (ret)
goto error;

+ isp->dev->dma_parms = &isp->dma_parms;
+ dma_set_max_seg_size(isp->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
+ dma_set_seg_boundary(isp->dev, 0xffffffff);

Whatever happens, 002edb6f6f2a should now make this line redundant :D

+
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, isp);

/* Regulators */
diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/isp.h
b/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/isp.h index e579943175c4..4b2231cf01be
100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/isp.h
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/isp.h
@@ -193,6 +193,7 @@ struct isp_device {
u32 syscon_offset;
u32 phy_type;

+ struct device_dma_parameters dma_parms;
struct dma_iommu_mapping *mapping;

/* ISP Obj */


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/