Re: [PATCH 1/8] block/genhd.c: Add error handling

[Jens Axboe]

On 11/09/2015 08:33 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 05:52:08PM +0530, Vishnu Pratap Singh wrote:
>
> Have you even tried to trigger the failure exits you've added?  The
> more you've successfully set up, the _less_ your cleanup code ends
> up undoing; that simply can't be right.
>
> That aside, as soon as we'd done register_disk(), the damn thing is
> available for open(), so bailing out is _really_ not something for
> faint-hearted - it's essentially equivalent to removal of device under
> somebody who'd opened it and might've started IO, etc.  Going there
> simply because some sysfs shite didn't get created doesn't look sane
> as far as I'm concerned...
>
> Especially since these failure exits are not going to be tested on
> a regular basis, so the amount of bitrot will be pretty high ;-/

I'd greatly prefer it we just leave it alone. Much better to have a disk 
that does actually work and with some sysfs spew in the logs, than bail 
out for fairly vague reasons.

The road to hell is paved with good intentions. It's a noble thought to 
want to clean this up, but I think it does more harm than good.

--
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/