Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] x86/cpufeature: Remove unused and seldomly used cpu_has_xx macros
From: Borislav Petkov
Date: Tue Nov 10 2015 - 07:47:48 EST
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 01:30:00PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> It's entirely silent on the difference between static_cpu_has() and
> static_cpu_has_safe() - what makes the second one 'safe'?
Yeah, those really are lacking some more fleshy and detailed
I'll document those properly.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/