Re: [PATCH 0/5] Fix regression introduced by set_irq_flags() removal

[Thomas Petazzoni]

Thomas,

On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 21:23:29 +0200 (CEST), Thomas Gleixner wrote:

> > However, relying on IRQ_NOAUTOEN being cleared doesn't seem like the
> > right long term solution, which is why I implemented what I believe is
> > a (hopefully) better long term solution.
> 
> Agreed.
> 
> I'll go over the proposed solution tomorrow afternoon (I'm
> traveling/conferencing...)

Have you had the time to consider the proposed solution? For 4.3 we
implemented the quick work-around that consisted in clearing
IRQ_NOAUTOEN, but it's probably not a very good long-term solution.

Don't hesitate to let me know if you'd like to see some modifications
to the proposed approach, or if you have a totally different approach
in mind.

Thanks,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/