Re: [PATCH] mtd: nand: mxc_nand: fix a possible NULL dereference
From: Uwe Kleine-König
Date: Thu Nov 12 2015 - 03:53:25 EST
CC += devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, gregkh
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 09:36:55AM +0100, Frans Klaver wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Uwe Kleine-König
> <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 09:03:11AM +0100, Frans Klaver wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 8:46 AM, LABBE Corentin
> >> <clabbe.montjoie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > of_match_device could return NULL, and so cause a NULL pointer
> >> > dereference later.
> >>
> >> Did you actually run into this? It seems to me that this driver is
> >> only probed if and only if we have a match and that therefore
> >> of_match_device will always return a valid pointer (it is using the
> >> same match table). Am I missing something?
> >
> > Yes, you're missing something. The driver would probe for a dt snippet
> > like:
> >
> > mxc_nand {
> > compatible = "foobar";
> > }
> >
> > In this case dev->of_node is non-NULL but of_match_device(mxcnd_dt_ids,
> > dev) is.
> >
> > (I didn't actually test this, so there is a chance I'm wrong here. And
> > if not I wonder if it is sensible at all to match the device name on
> > driver name for of-created platform devices.)
>
> Yea, looks like you're right. platform devices check a number of
> things to determine a match, among which is driver name if all else
> fails (platform.c, platform_match()).
Maybe something like this would help to reduce surprises:
diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c
index f80aaaf9f610..a9fc22c86552 100644
--- a/drivers/base/platform.c
+++ b/drivers/base/platform.c
@@ -840,8 +840,8 @@ static int platform_match(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *drv)
return !strcmp(pdev->driver_override, drv->name);
/* Attempt an OF style match first */
- if (of_driver_match_device(dev, drv))
- return 1;
+ if (pdev->dev.of_node)
+ return of_driver_match_device(dev, drv);
/* Then try ACPI style match */
if (acpi_driver_match_device(dev, drv))
Maybe something similar for acpi devices is desirable, too?
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/