Re: [PATCH] X.509: Fix the time validation [ver #2]
From: Woodhouse, David
Date: Thu Nov 12 2015 - 05:38:16 EST
On Thu, 2015-11-12 at 09:36 +0000, David Howells wrote:
> If it works, it emit a key ID; if it fails, it should give a bad
> message error.
In this sentence, failure is good, yes? This is a malformed key so we
*expect* the failure?
David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@xxxxxxxxx Intel Corporation
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature