Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] iio: adc: add IMX7D ADC driver support

[Haibo Chen]

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 03:58:14PM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 11/09/2015 02:28 PM, Haibo Chen wrote:
> > Freescale i.MX7D soc contains a new ADC IP. This patch add this ADC
> > driver support, and the driver only support ADC software trigger.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Looks pretty good, a few comments inline.
> 
> [...]
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > +#include <linux/delay.h>
> > +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> > +#include <linux/slab.h>
> > +#include <linux/io.h>
> > +#include <linux/clk.h>
> > +#include <linux/completion.h>
> > +#include <linux/of.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
> > +#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> > +#include <linux/err.h>
> 
> I don't think you need all of these.
> 
> [...]

Yes, I will remove delay.h slab.h of_irq.h and of_platform.h

> > +static void imx7d_adc_feature_config(struct imx7d_adc *info)
> > +{
> > +	info->adc_feature.clk_pre_div = IMX7D_ADC_ANALOG_CLK_PRE_DIV_4;
> > +	info->adc_feature.avg_num = IMX7D_ADC_AVERAGE_NUM_32;
> > +	info->adc_feature.core_time_unit = 1;
> > +	info->adc_feature.average_en = true;
> 
> What's the plan for these? Right now they are always initialized to the same
> static value.
> 

In future, we can get these values from dts file, currently we just use the static value.

> 
> > +}
> [...]
> > +static int imx7d_adc_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > +			struct iio_chan_spec const *chan,
> > +			int *val,
> > +			int *val2,
> > +			long mask)
> > +{
> > +	struct imx7d_adc *info = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > +
> > +	u32 channel;
> > +	long ret;
> > +
> > +	switch (mask) {
> > +	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW:
> > +		mutex_lock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> > +		reinit_completion(&info->completion);
> > +
> > +		channel = (chan->channel) & 0x0f;
> > +		info->channel = channel;
> > +		imx7d_adc_channel_set(info);
> 
> How about just passing channel directy adc_channel_set() instead of doing it
> implicitly through the info struct?
> 

I think there is no difference, besides, using this parameter info struct can keep align with other functions.
eg.  imx7d_adc_sample_set(), imx7d_adc_hw_init(), imx7d_adc_get_sample_rate(), all these functions have the same parameter.

> [...]
> > +static irqreturn_t imx7d_adc_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
> > +{
> > +	struct imx7d_adc *info = (struct imx7d_adc *)dev_id;
> > +	int status;
> > +
> > +	status = readl(info->regs + IMX7D_REG_ADC_INT_STATUS);
> > +	if (status & IMX7D_REG_ADC_INT_STATUS_CHANNEL_INT_STATUS) {
> > +		info->value = imx7d_adc_read_data(info);
> > +		complete(&info->completion);
> > +	}
> > +	writel(0, info->regs + IMX7D_REG_ADC_INT_STATUS);
> 
> Is the hardware really this broken? If the interrupt happens between reading
> the status register and clearing it here it will be missed.
> 

I think interrupt can't happen between reading the status register and clearing it.
Because in function imx7d_adc_read_raw(), we call the function 
imx7d_adc_channel_set(info), in this function, we config the register
REG_ADC_CH_A\B\C\D_CFG1 and REG_ADC_CH_A\B\C\D_CFG2, only when these registers
is configed, ADC start a conversion. Once the conversion complete, ADC trigger an 
interrupt, and call the imx7d_adc_isr().

> > +
> > +	return IRQ_HANDLED;
> 
> You should only return IRQ_HANDLED if you actually handled are interrupt.
> 

Here in the interrupt, we just handle the channel conversion finished flag, for
other flag, ignore them this time, Will add other flag in future.

> > +}
> [...]
> > +
> > +static int imx7d_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > +	struct imx7d_adc *info;
> > +	struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
> > +	struct resource *mem;
> > +	int irq;
> > +	int ret;
> > +	u32 channels;
> > +
> > +	indio_dev = devm_iio_device_alloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct imx7d_adc));
> > +	if (!indio_dev) {
> > +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed allocating iio device\n");
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	info = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > +	info->dev = &pdev->dev;
> > +
> > +	mem = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> > +	info->regs = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, mem);
> > +	if (IS_ERR(info->regs)) {
> > +		ret = PTR_ERR(info->regs);
> > +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to remap adc memory: %d\n", ret);
> > +		return ret;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> > +	if (irq < 0) {
> > +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no irq resource?\n");
> > +		return irq;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	ret = devm_request_irq(info->dev, irq,
> > +				imx7d_adc_isr, 0,
> > +				dev_name(&pdev->dev), info);
> 
> This is too early. Completion is not initialized, clocks are not enabled, etc...
> 

You are right, I will move the request irq function down.
> > +	if (ret < 0) {
> > +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed requesting irq, irq = %d\n", irq);
> > +		return ret;
> > +	}
> > +
> [...]
> > +	ret  = of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node,
> 
> Extra space.
> 
> > +					"num-channels", &channels);
> 
> What decides how many channels are in use?
> 

The board decides the channel number.
In dts file, there is a line:     num-channels = <4>;


> > +	if (ret)
> > +		channels = ARRAY_SIZE(imx7d_adc_iio_channels);
> > +
> > +	indio_dev->name = dev_name(&pdev->dev);
> > +	indio_dev->dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
> > +	indio_dev->dev.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
> > +	indio_dev->info = &imx7d_adc_iio_info;
> > +	indio_dev->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE;
> > +	indio_dev->channels = imx7d_adc_iio_channels;
> > +	indio_dev->num_channels = (int)channels;
> 
> I don't think you need the case here.
> 

Sorry, can't get your point, you mean I should not indio_dev-> ?

> >[...]

-- 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/