[PATCH 3.16.y-ckt 80/94] Revert "md: allow a partially recovered device to be hot-added to an array."

[Luis Henriques]

3.16.7-ckt20 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>

commit d01552a76d71f9879af448e9142389ee9be6e95b upstream.

This reverts commit 7eb418851f3278de67126ea0c427641ab4792c57.

This commit is poorly justified, I can find not discusison in email,
and it clearly causes a problem.

If a device which is being recovered fails and is subsequently
re-added to an array, there could easily have been changes to the
array *before* the point where the recovery was up to.  So the
recovery must start again from the beginning.

If a spare is being recovered and fails, then when it is re-added we
really should do a bitmap-based recovery up to the recovery-offset,
and then a full recovery from there.  Before this reversion, we only
did the "full recovery from there" which is not corect.  After this
reversion with will do a full recovery from the start, which is safer
but not ideal.

It will be left to a future patch to arrange the two different styles
of recovery.

Reported-and-tested-by: Nate Dailey <nate.dailey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
Fixes: 7eb418851f32 ("md: allow a partially recovered device to be hot-added to an array.")
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/md/md.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
index 9fc6c5de0638..4bd7f2729c16 100644
--- a/drivers/md/md.c
+++ b/drivers/md/md.c
@@ -7772,8 +7772,7 @@ static int remove_and_add_spares(struct mddev *mddev,
 		       !test_bit(Bitmap_sync, &rdev->flags)))
 			continue;
 
-		if (rdev->saved_raid_disk < 0)
-			rdev->recovery_offset = 0;
+		rdev->recovery_offset = 0;
 		if (mddev->pers->
 		    hot_add_disk(mddev, rdev) == 0) {
 			if (sysfs_link_rdev(mddev, rdev))
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/