RE: [PATCH] IB/sa: replace GFP_KERNEL with GFP_ATOMIC

[Wan, Kaike]

I don't think so. 

The following patch has rendered this patch unnecessary:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7526811/

Kaike

> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-rdma-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-rdma-
> owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Saurabh Sengar
> Sent: Friday, November 13, 2015 2:42 AM
> To: Weiny, Ira; Wan, Kaike
> Cc: Hefty, Sean; hal.rosenstock@xxxxxxxxx; dledford@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB/sa: replace GFP_KERNEL with GFP_ATOMIC
> 
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015  at 04:30:10 +0000, Weiny, Ira wrote:
> > Until we can remove the spinlock the current proposed patch should be
> > applied in the interim.  Sorry for the noise before.
> 
> > Reviewed-By: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Hi,
> 
> is this patch expected to be applied ?
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the
> body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at
> http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/