Re: [PATCH 2/2] thermal: rcar_thermal: use pm_runtime_put_sync()

From: Ulf Hansson
Date: Fri Nov 13 2015 - 10:06:23 EST

On 12 November 2015 at 19:43, Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello,
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 09:04:09AM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> >
>> > OK
>> >
>> > If we did that, all devices that had just been unbound from their drivers
>> > and had runtime PM disabled after that would be set to "suspended" by the
>> > core, right?
>> Yes, that's the idea. I will send a patch we can test.
>> >
>> > If that helps, I don't really have objections.
> Given this discussion,
> Is this series of two patches on this thermal driver still applicable?

I think patch1 is different, it's a cleanup patch (I just replied to
it separately).

As for subject patch, I think we agreed upon that it's a workaround
but I don't have strong opinion if you want to pick it up anyway.

On the other hand the change won't be needed *if* we solve problem via
driver core. I intend to send a patch for this on Monday, keep you on

Kind regards
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at