Re: [PATCH] Staging: iio: iio_simple_dummy_buffer: Typo in comments area
From: Jonathan Cameron
Date: Sat Nov 14 2015 - 12:21:59 EST
On 14/11/15 09:28, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 11/14/2015 03:44 AM, Nizam Haider wrote:
>> Fix simple typo in comments
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nizam Haider <nijamh@xxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks for the patch.
>
>> ---
>> drivers/staging/iio/iio_simple_dummy_buffer.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/iio_simple_dummy_buffer.c b/drivers/staging/iio/iio_simple_dummy_buffer.c
>> index cf44a6f..c8f889b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/iio_simple_dummy_buffer.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/iio_simple_dummy_buffer.c
>> @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static irqreturn_t iio_simple_dummy_trigger_h(int irq, void *p)
>> * software scans: can be considered to be random access
>> * so efficient reading is just a case of minimal bus
>> * transactions.
>> - * software culled hardware scans:
>> + * software called hardware scans:
>
> I don't think that's a typo. The non-patched version makes a lot more sense
> then the patched vesion.
Yup, that's me using some 'more unusual' English terminology, Perhaps the word
'dropped' would be clearer.
Also, that comment is now a little misleading as it is unusual / undesirable
to now do this in an individual driver. The core demux code should take care
of it.
Hmm.. I'll make a note to reread the comments in that driver and see if any
others could do with a refresh.
Jonathan
>
>> * occasionally a driver may process the nearest hardware
>> * scan to avoid storing elements that are not desired. This
>> * is the fiddliest option by far.
>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/