[PATCH 5/7] phy: miphy28lp: add missing of_node_put

From: Julia Lawall
Date: Mon Nov 16 2015 - 06:45:37 EST


for_each_child_of_node performs an of_node_get on each iteration,
so a return from the middle of the loop requires an of_node_put.

A simplified version of the semantic patch that finds this problem is as
follows (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr):

// <smpl>
@@
expression root,e;
local idexpression child;
@@

for_each_child_of_node(root, child) {
... when != of_node_put(child)
when != e = child
(
return child;
|
* return ...;
)
...
}
// </smpl>

Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@xxxxxxx>

---
drivers/phy/phy-miphy28lp.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-miphy28lp.c b/drivers/phy/phy-miphy28lp.c
index c47b56b..3acd2a1 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/phy-miphy28lp.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/phy-miphy28lp.c
@@ -1226,15 +1226,18 @@ static int miphy28lp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)

miphy_phy = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*miphy_phy),
GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!miphy_phy)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ if (!miphy_phy) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ goto put_child;
+ }

miphy_dev->phys[port] = miphy_phy;

phy = devm_phy_create(&pdev->dev, child, &miphy28lp_ops);
if (IS_ERR(phy)) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to create PHY\n");
- return PTR_ERR(phy);
+ ret = PTR_ERR(phy);
+ goto put_child;
}

miphy_dev->phys[port]->phy = phy;
@@ -1242,11 +1245,11 @@ static int miphy28lp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)

ret = miphy28lp_of_probe(child, miphy_phy);
if (ret)
- return ret;
+ goto put_child;

ret = miphy28lp_probe_resets(child, miphy_dev->phys[port]);
if (ret)
- return ret;
+ goto put_child;

phy_set_drvdata(phy, miphy_dev->phys[port]);
port++;
@@ -1255,6 +1258,9 @@ static int miphy28lp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)

provider = devm_of_phy_provider_register(&pdev->dev, miphy28lp_xlate);
return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(provider);
+put_child:
+ of_node_put(child);
+ return ret;
}

static const struct of_device_id miphy28lp_of_match[] = {

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/