[PATCH 3/3] apparmor: use list_next_entry instead of list_entry_next

[Geliang Tang]

list_next_entry has been defined in list.h, so I replace list_entry_next
with it.

Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@xxxxxxx>
---
 security/apparmor/apparmorfs.c | 8 +++-----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/apparmor/apparmorfs.c b/security/apparmor/apparmorfs.c
index ad4fa49..7a00bb7 100644
--- a/security/apparmor/apparmorfs.c
+++ b/security/apparmor/apparmorfs.c
@@ -550,8 +550,6 @@ fail2:
 }
 
 
-#define list_entry_next(pos, member) \
-	list_entry(pos->member.next, typeof(*pos), member)
 #define list_entry_is_head(pos, head, member) (&pos->member == (head))
 
 /**
@@ -582,7 +580,7 @@ static struct aa_namespace *__next_namespace(struct aa_namespace *root,
 	parent = ns->parent;
 	while (ns != root) {
 		mutex_unlock(&ns->lock);
-		next = list_entry_next(ns, base.list);
+		next = list_next_entry(ns, base.list);
 		if (!list_entry_is_head(next, &parent->sub_ns, base.list)) {
 			mutex_lock(&next->lock);
 			return next;
@@ -636,7 +634,7 @@ static struct aa_profile *__next_profile(struct aa_profile *p)
 	parent = rcu_dereference_protected(p->parent,
 					   mutex_is_locked(&p->ns->lock));
 	while (parent) {
-		p = list_entry_next(p, base.list);
+		p = list_next_entry(p, base.list);
 		if (!list_entry_is_head(p, &parent->base.profiles, base.list))
 			return p;
 		p = parent;
@@ -645,7 +643,7 @@ static struct aa_profile *__next_profile(struct aa_profile *p)
 	}
 
 	/* is next another profile in the namespace */
-	p = list_entry_next(p, base.list);
+	p = list_next_entry(p, base.list);
 	if (!list_entry_is_head(p, &ns->base.profiles, base.list))
 		return p;
 
-- 
2.5.0


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/