Re: [PATCH] xen/x86: Adjust stack pointer in xen_sysexit

[H. Peter Anvin]

On 11/16/15 12:22, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> 
> Huh, so what's wrong with a jump:
> 
> 	jmp 1f
> 	swapgs
> 	1:
> 

What is the point of that jump?

>> If it would make you feel better, it could be X86_BUG_XENPV :-p
> 
> That doesn't matter - I just don't want to open the flood gates on
> pseudo feature bits.
> 
> hpa, what do you think?

Pseudo feature bits are fine, we already have plenty of them.  They make
sense as they let us reuse a lot of infrastructure.

	-hpa


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/