Re: [PATCH 2/4] timer: relax tick stop in idle entry
From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Mon Nov 16 2015 - 17:02:04 EST
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015, Jacob Pan wrote:
> For the second case, which is much more rare, I think we do have next
> timer exactly one tick away. Just don't know why tick will continue into
> idle loop.
Well, it should not be hard to figure that out. There are not so many
checks involved when tick_nohz_irq_exit() is called.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/