Re: [PATCH 12/13] perf test: Test BPF prologue

[Wangnan (F)]

Hi Arnaldo,

On 2015/11/17 9:29, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:

[SNIP]
> I've pushed everything to my perf/ebpf branch, please let me know if
> what is there is acceptable, then it will be up to Ingo to decide where
> to put this, if in perf/urgent for this merge window, or in perf/core,
> for the next one.

I have checked and tested your changes in your perf/ebpf and they
are okay to me.

> Ah, to extract the output for these BPF sub-tests I had to use -v, i.e.
> just:
>
>    # perf test BPF
>    37: Test BPF filter                                          : Ok
>    #
>
> Ditto for the LLVM one.
>
> Doesn't tell us too much about all those nice sub-tests...
>
> How about:
>
>    # perf test -v BPF
>    37: Test BPF filter:
>    37.1: test a						       : Ok
>    37.2: test b						       : Ok
>    37.3: Test BPF prologue generation			       : Ok
>    37.4: Another...                                             : Ok
>    37: Test BPF filter					       : Ok
>    #

I have sent a cset based on perf/ebpf in [1]. With the last 3 patch
you will see 'perf test' output information in this way. Please have a try:

# ./perf test LLVM BPF
35: Test LLVM searching and compiling                        :
35.1: Basic BPF llvm compiling test                          : Ok
35.2: Test kbuild searching                                  : Ok
35.3: Compile source for BPF prologue generation test        : Ok
37: Test BPF filter                                          :
37.1: Test basic BPF filtering                               : Ok
37.2: Test BPF prologue generation                           : Ok

Thank you.

[1] 
http://lkml.kernel.org/g/1447749170-175898-1-git-send-email-wangnan0@xxxxxxxxxx

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/