Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf tools: Add callchain order support for libunwind DWARF unwinder

[Jiri Olsa]

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 02:41:14PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:

SNIP

> > I'm not sure whether we can regard this behavior changing as a bugfix? I
> > think
> > there may be some reason the original code explicitly avoid creating an '0'
> > entry.
> 
> I think callchain value being 0 is an error or marker for the end of
> callchain.  So it'd be better avoiding 0 entry.
> 
> But unfortunately, we have many 0 entries (and broken callchain after
> them) with fp recording on optimized binaries.  I think we should omit
> those callchains.
> 
> Maybe something like this?
> 
> 
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/machine.c b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
> index 5ef90be2a249..22642c5719ab 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/machine.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
> @@ -1850,6 +1850,15 @@ static int thread__resolve_callchain_sample(struct thread *thread,
>  #endif
>  		ip = chain->ips[j];
>  
> +		/* callchain value inside zero page means it's broken, stop */
> +		if (ip < 4096) {
> +			if (callchain_param.order == ORDER_CALLER) {
> +				callchain_cursor_reset(&callchain_cursor);

hum, do we want to throw away whatever we have till now?

jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/