Re: [PATCH 3/4] sched: introduce synchronized idle injection

From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Wed Nov 18 2015 - 10:22:22 EST

On Wed, 18 Nov 2015, Jacob Pan wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 15:09:44 +0000
> Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Okay. But it does mean that the defeault idle period is 5 ticks (50ms
> > @ HZ=100) and not 5 ms
> correct. my reason is to scale with various HZ values.

So for smaller HZ values we get longer disruption. That's well thought
out scaling.



To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at