Re: [PATCH] arm64: restore bogomips information in /proc/cpuinfo

[Shi, Yang]

On 11/18/2015 10:47 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 10:15:05AM -0800, Yang Shi wrote:
> > As what Pavel Machek reported [1], some userspace applications depend on
> > bogomips showed by /proc/cpuinfo.
> >
> > Although there is much less legacy impact on aarch64 than arm, but it does
> > break libvirt.
> >
> > Basically, this patch reverts commit 326b16db9f69fd0d279be873c6c00f88c0a4aad5
> > ("arm64: delay: don't bother reporting bogomips in /proc/cpuinfo"), but with
> > some tweak due to context change.
> >
> > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/4/132
>
> I lost this argument last time around, so I won't re-tread that path this
> time around. I do, however, have some comments on the patch.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c | 5 +++++
> >   arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c     | 7 ++++++-
> >   2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
> > index 706679d..8d4ba77 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
> > @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
> >   #include <linux/seq_file.h>
> >   #include <linux/sched.h>
> >   #include <linux/smp.h>
> > +#include <linux/delay.h>
> >
> >   /*
> >    * In case the boot CPU is hotpluggable, we record its initial state and
> > @@ -112,6 +113,10 @@ static int c_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> >   		 */
> >   		seq_printf(m, "processor\t: %d\n", i);
> >
> > +		seq_printf(m, "BogoMIPS\t: %lu.%02lu\n\n",
>
> This double newline makes /proc/cpuinfo looks really odd. Can we just
> have one, please?
>
> > +			   loops_per_jiffy / (500000UL/HZ),
> > +			   loops_per_jiffy / (5000UL/HZ) % 100);
> > +
> >   		/*
> >   		 * Dump out the common processor features in a single line.
> >   		 * Userspace should read the hwcaps with getauxval(AT_HWCAP)
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> > index b1adc51..1bed772 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> > @@ -326,7 +326,12 @@ static void __init hyp_mode_check(void)
> >
> >   void __init smp_cpus_done(unsigned int max_cpus)
> >   {
> > -	pr_info("SMP: Total of %d processors activated.\n", num_online_cpus());
> > +	unsigned long bogosum = loops_per_jiffy * num_online_cpus();
> > +
> > +	pr_info("SMP: Total of %d processors activated (%lu.%02lu BogoMIPS).\n",
> > +		num_online_cpus(), bogosum / (500000/HZ),
> > +		(bogosum / (5000/HZ)) % 100);
>
> Can we drop this hunk? I don't see a pressing need to print this in
> dmesg.

Sure, will solve them in v2.

Thanks,
Yang

> With those two changes:
>
>    Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
>
> I guess this needs Cc'ing to stable, too.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Will

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/