Re: [PATCH 02/10] KVM: x86: MMU: Add helper function to clear a bit in unsync child bitmap

[Takuya Yoshikawa]

On 2015/11/18 11:44, Xiao Guangrong wrote:

> On 11/12/2015 07:50 PM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> > +            if (!ret) {
> > +                clear_unsync_child_bit(sp, i);
> > +                continue;
> > +            } else if (ret > 0) {
> >                   nr_unsync_leaf += ret;
>
> Just a single line here, braces are unnecessary.
>
> > -            else
> > +            } else
> >                   return ret;

I know we can eliminate the braces, but that does not mean
we should do so: there seems to be no consensus about this
style issue and checkpatch accepts both ways.

Actually, some people prefer to put braces when one of the
if/else-if/else cases has multiple lines.  You can see
some examples in kernel/sched/core.c: see hrtick_start(),
sched_fork(), free_sched_domain().

In our case, I thought putting braces would align the else-if
and else and make the code look a bit nicer, but I know this
may be just a matter of personal feeling.

In short, unless the maintainer, Paolo for this file, has any
preference, both ways will be accepted.

  Takuya

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/