Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] misc: eeprom_93xx46: Implement eeprom_93xx46 DT bindings.

From: Vladimir Zapolskiy
Date: Thu Nov 19 2015 - 00:51:27 EST


Hi Cory,

On 19.11.2015 05:29, Cory Tusar wrote:
> This commit implements bindings in the eeprom_93xx46 driver allowing
> device word size and read-only attributes to be specified via
> devicetree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cory Tusar <cory.tusar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/misc/eeprom/eeprom_93xx46.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom/eeprom_93xx46.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom/eeprom_93xx46.c
> index e1bf0a5..1f29d9a 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/eeprom/eeprom_93xx46.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom/eeprom_93xx46.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,8 @@
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/mutex.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/spi/spi.h>
> #include <linux/sysfs.h>
> @@ -294,12 +296,71 @@ static ssize_t eeprom_93xx46_store_erase(struct device *dev,
> }
> static DEVICE_ATTR(erase, S_IWUSR, NULL, eeprom_93xx46_store_erase);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> +static const struct of_device_id eeprom_93xx46_of_table[] = {
> + { .compatible = "eeprom-93xx46", },
> + {}
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, eeprom_93xx46_of_table);
> +

Please move this declaration closer to struct spi_driver
eeprom_93xx46_driver below.

Also you can avoid #ifdef here, if you write

.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(eeprom_93xx46_of_table)

Whenever possible please avoid #ifdef's in .c files.

> +static int eeprom_93xx46_probe_dt(struct spi_device *spi)
> +{
> + struct device_node *np = spi->dev.of_node;
> + struct eeprom_93xx46_platform_data *pd;
> + u32 tmp;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!of_match_device(eeprom_93xx46_of_table, &spi->dev))
> + return 0;
> +
> + pd = devm_kzalloc(&spi->dev, sizeof(*pd), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!pd)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "data-size", &tmp);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(&spi->dev, "data-size property not found\n");
> + goto error_free;

Because you use devm_* resource allocation in .probe, just return error.

Plus I would suggest to change "data-size" property to an optional one,
here I mean that if it is omitted, then by default consider pd->flags |=
EE_ADDR8.

> + }
> +
> + if (tmp == 8) {
> + pd->flags |= EE_ADDR8;
> + } else if (tmp == 16) {
> + pd->flags |= EE_ADDR16;
> + } else {
> + dev_err(&spi->dev, "invalid data-size (%d)\n", tmp);
> + goto error_free;

Same here.

> + }
> +
> + if (of_property_read_bool(np, "read-only"))
> + pd->flags |= EE_READONLY;
> +
> + spi->dev.platform_data = pd;
> +
> + return 1;

On success please return 0.

> +error_free:
> + devm_kfree(&spi->dev, pd);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +#else
> +static inline int eeprom_93xx46_probe_dt(struct spi_device *spi)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
> +

I actually don't see a point to have #ifdef CONFIG_OF here.

Instead please add a check for !spi->dev.of_node at the beginning of
eeprom_93xx46_probe_dt() or in .probe()

> static int eeprom_93xx46_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> {
> struct eeprom_93xx46_platform_data *pd;
> struct eeprom_93xx46_dev *edev;
> int err;
>
> + err = eeprom_93xx46_probe_dt(spi);
> + if (err < 0)
> + return err;
> +
> pd = spi->dev.platform_data;
> if (!pd) {
> dev_err(&spi->dev, "missing platform data\n");
> @@ -370,6 +431,7 @@ static int eeprom_93xx46_remove(struct spi_device *spi)
> static struct spi_driver eeprom_93xx46_driver = {
> .driver = {
> .name = "93xx46",
> + .of_match_table = eeprom_93xx46_of_table,
> },
> .probe = eeprom_93xx46_probe,
> .remove = eeprom_93xx46_remove,
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/