Re: [PATCH 2/5] arm64: cpufeature: Track unsigned fields

[Suzuki K. Poulose]

On 19/11/15 10:03, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
> On 19/11/15 04:57, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> >  From my curiosity,
> > can you please clarify your criteria regarding which fields of a register should be signed or unsigned?
> > I guessed that the fields marked with FTR_LOWER_SAFE or FTR_HIGHER_SAFE could be unsigned,

Also, the unsigned values are not restricted to LOWER_SAFE/HIGHER_SAFE, but also applies for
FTR_EXACT, so that we use the appropriate methods to extract them.


Suzuki

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/